doctortease:

(Part one, part two.)

After initial visual inspection and baseline vitals were established for Ivy (hereinafter “subject”), the session proceeded as per standard protocol. Subject was responsive and aroused. Subject was vocal despite attempted self-restraint.

Of particular interest for this exam were the subject’s orgasmic threshold, pain threshold, and verbal or physical cues to indicate their approach. The following techniques were employed to glean data.

• Subject’s glans clitoris and labia were stimulated manually.
• Subject, while sight-deprived, was allowed to hear a nitrile glove being donned.
• Subject was offered and accepted synthetic lubrication.
• Subject’s vaginal canal was penetrated with a single finger. (note: concern about diameter expressed here, unusually early)
• Subject was stimulated via vibrating wand fitted with silicone diffuser head.
• Subject was induced to choose between body weight on said wand or sustained stress posture. (note: she chose tiptoes)
• Subject was bent at the waist, and manual impact stimulus was employed.
• Subject was eventually persuaded to count manual impact stimulus aloud. Impact was extended to the upper thighs and the soles of the feet, in addition to the traditional posterior site, as part of this persuasion
• (Note that by this point self-lubrication had made synthetic reapplication redundant.)
• Subject was penetrated with two gloved fingers. Vocal protest increased sharply. Significant pressure noted.
• Subject was turned onto reverse side to allow for tactile examination of breast tissue and, again, application of the wand.
• Subject’s legs were repositioned to allow for maximum exposure.
• The exam proceeded to phase three.

Keep reading