Gallery

dirtylittlechemist:

wolvestone:

sir-ryan-lancelot:

There’s something wrong with you if you scoop up a handful of M&M’s knowing only 10% aren’t going to kill you just like it’s stupid to commit to multiple guys at once instead of doing a “taste test” so to speak.

I don’t get the M & M reference. And all men aren’t monsters so what are they trying to say? Can’t we just teach not to rape and teach kids early not to take advantage of people. I hate it when they get into the “all men are like this” mode. Obviously your ignorant if you think all men will rape you. Why on earth do feminist keep saying that, it’s the furthest thing from the truth. Men will rape yes, but every man will rape, no that just isn’t fucking true and it’s upsetting when they keep repeating it and repeating it like they want it to be true. For Christ sake three of my own blood were raped and if I could find the sick son of a bitch who did it I’d torture each one of them. I’d torture and kill them and make a video and post it on YouTube. And I’d go to prison with a smile on my face. So when I hear “all men” I fucking boil inside because they’re putting me in the same category as the trash that hurt my mother, my father, and my sister. And it’s like they don’t even care to think that men get raped too. Most as boys, defenseless little boys like my father was. Little boys who didn’t wear revealing clothing, or flirted with the fucking guy. A rapist is gonna rape because they want to rape it has nothing to do with what you’re wearing or how you act. I am all for feminism and the #allwomen or whatever it’s called campaign but I’m not for preaching ignorance. And a lot of what I’ve seen; 3 out of 7 of the stuff they post is ignorance. Rape is wrong, just like saying all men will rape you is wrong.

I don’t normally get too involved, but the irony of you not getting the M&M reference is too great. The reference is showing that we acknowledge not all men are rapists.

It means if we know one in ten (for example) M&Ms are poisoned, why would we take the risk of taking one? Apply this same theory to men- if one in ten (for example) men are rapists, or violent, why in the damn hell would we risk dating one, when those odds are so great?

So yes, not all men are rapists or violent, but all women have to consider the chance that: the guy she is turning down; the guy who groped her on the bus; the guy who seems to be nice; even her boyfriend; or the guy she’s been set up on a blind date with could be a rapist. Hell, I wouldn’t take those chances, and I think most women don’t.

BAHAHAHAHAHA they pulled “not all men” on a post critiquing the act of saying “not all men.” I can’t.

Leave a Reply